Comparing the two statutory assessment points
The Progress check at two and the EYFS Profile are statutory assessments at different stages of a child’s early education in England. One takes place between a child’s second and third birthday; the other is completed in the final term of Reception. Their timing, coverage and format reflect different purposes, from reviewing development in the prime areas to recording attainment against early learning goals. The results give parents and professionals information to support a child’s next steps, including planning for the move into Year 1.
Scope and timing
The progress check takes place when a child is aged between two and three. It is a statutory requirement for early years providers, and is normally carried out by a practitioner who knows the child through their day-to-day learning and care. The check offers an early point to review development and identify where a child may benefit from further observation, discussion or support. Its timing allows practitioners and parents to consider development before the child reaches the end of the early years foundation stage.
The EYFS Profile is completed in the final term of Reception, usually when children are five or approaching their fifth birthday. It is also statutory, but it is a separate assessment with a later focus: a teacher assesses the child’s learning and development at the end of the EYFS. The class teacher draws on knowledge built through work and observations over time, rather than treating a single activity as a complete measure of learning.
These different points matter because development and learning change quickly across the early years. At two to three, a review can help practitioners and parents notice emerging needs and agree relevant next steps while a child is still in an early years setting. In Reception, the final-term assessment gives the school a considered picture of learning at the end of that stage, which can inform the Year 1 teacher’s planning. The age-two check is not an earlier version of the Profile: each has its own timing, scope and purpose.
What they cover
The progress check focuses on the three prime areas of the Early Years Foundation Stage: communication and language, physical development, and personal, social and emotional development. These broad areas provide a way to consider how a child is progressing in everyday interactions and experiences. Practitioners draw on what they have seen the child do over time, including play, routines and communication, rather than relying on a formal test or a single developmental milestone.
The outcome is a written summary of development, not a set of scores against the Reception learning goals. It describes strengths and areas where progress may be less than expected, helping adults consider appropriate support and learning opportunities. This makes the check a focused review of development at an early point, rather than a final judgement about a child’s later attainment.
The EYFS Profile has a broader end-of-stage scope. It assesses children against 17 early learning goals across all seven EYFS areas: the three prime areas, literacy, mathematics, understanding the world, and expressive arts and design. Teachers use evidence gathered through ordinary classroom practice to make a judgement for each goal. The judgements are recorded as emerging or expected, reflecting whether a child is working towards or meeting the expectation described for that goal.
The two formats serve different questions. The age-two review considers progress in the three foundational areas and helps shape near-term support; the Profile records how a Reception child’s learning compares with end-of-EYFS expectations across the full curriculum. Neither is a general ranking of children, and the Profile does not replace ongoing classroom assessment. The Reception baseline assessment is separate from the EYFS Profile: it is not another name for the Profile or part of its 17-goal judgement.
Who receives results
For the progress check, the early years provider shares the written summary with the child’s parent or carer. The practitioner and setting can use the findings to discuss the child’s development and plan suitable experiences or additional support. Where relevant, information may also be shared with health professionals involved with the child, following appropriate information-sharing arrangements.
For the EYFS Profile, the school shares the child’s results with parents and reports the required assessment information to the local authority. Within the school, the Reception teacher and Year 1 teacher can use the Profile to support continuity, with relevant information informing plans for learning and support as the child moves into the next year group. Parents receive a record of how their child was assessed against the early learning goals; the Profile is not a report card based on numerical scores.
Both assessments therefore involve parents, but the professional context differs: an early years practitioner leads the earlier review, while the Reception teacher completes the end-of-stage Profile. Clear communication helps parents understand the information and gives the receiving teacher a useful starting point for planning.
Comparison table
The main differences are the child’s age, the breadth of learning assessed and the form in which findings are recorded. Both are statutory, but neither assessment substitutes for the other.
| Comparison point | Progress check at two | EYFS Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Completed when the child is aged between two and three. | Completed in the final term of Reception. |
| Legal basis | Statutory requirement within the EYFS for early years providers. | Statutory assessment at the end of the EYFS in Reception. |
| Who carries it out | An early years practitioner who works with the child and knows their development. | The child’s Reception teacher, using evidence from learning and classroom practice. |
| Coverage | Three prime areas: communication and language; physical development; personal, social and emotional development. | 17 early learning goals across seven EYFS areas, including the three prime areas and four specific areas. |
| Format | A written summary of development, including strengths and areas where progress may be less than expected. | A judgement for each early learning goal, recorded as emerging or expected. |
| Who receives results | The child’s parent or carer; relevant professionals may receive information where appropriate and subject to information-sharing arrangements. | Parents and the local authority receive the relevant Profile information; school staff use it for educational planning. |
| Principal immediate use | Inform discussion with parents and help the setting plan learning experiences or support. | Give the Year 1 teacher information for transition and support planning. The Reception baseline assessment is separate from the Profile. |
The age-two summary is a focused review of development, whereas the Profile records end-of-stage judgements across the EYFS curriculum. Read together with practitioners’ ongoing observations, each provides information suited to its own point in a child’s education.
The progress check at age two
A clear account of a young child’s learning can help families and practitioners discuss what is going well and where support may be useful. The check draws on what a child does during familiar activities, rather than relying on a single performance. Its written summary gives parents a practical point of reference for conversations with the early years setting. When concerns arise, communication with the health visitor can help connect the setting’s observations with the child’s health review.
Purpose and timing
The early years provider carries out the check when a child is between two and three years old. Completing it within this age range is a statutory duty for providers in England. The practitioner who knows the child’s experiences in the setting is well placed to draw together observations from everyday play, conversations and care routines. This makes the review relevant to the child’s actual participation, not just to what they can do in an unfamiliar, one-off activity.
The purpose is to build a concise picture of development across the areas that underpin early learning and relationships. Practitioners can notice, for example, how a child communicates during play, moves around the setting and responds to other people. These observations support child development monitoring and help the practitioner recognise strengths as well as areas where progress may be less than expected. The check is not a diagnosis; it helps adults decide whether a child may benefit from additional support or a closer conversation.
Timing matters because a review between two and three gives parents and practitioners an opportunity to discuss emerging needs while the child is still attending an early years setting. If an area of development raises a concern, the adults can consider suitable next steps rather than waiting for the child to move on to another stage. A timely discussion also gives parents the chance to add what they see at home, where a child may communicate, play or manage routines differently from how they do in the setting.
What the summary contains
The provider records the outcome in a short written summary. It focuses on the three prime areas of learning and development, noting strengths and any areas where progress is less than expected. The summary should make the child’s current development understandable to parents and identify practical next steps, including a referral where one is appropriate.
- Communication and language: observations of how the child listens, understands familiar language and communicates needs, ideas or interests during everyday activities.
- Physical development: a picture of how the child uses movement and coordination, and develops growing independence in relevant care routines.
- Personal, social and emotional development: observations of relationships, emotional responses, confidence and participation in familiar play and routines.
- Strengths: specific things the child is doing well, described through examples from play, interactions or familiar activities in the setting.
- Progress needing attention: any area where development appears less advanced than expected, described clearly without reducing the child to a label.
- Next steps or referrals: suggested actions for parents and practitioners, or a referral for further advice when the child’s needs indicate it.
These points give the discussion a shared focus: what the child can do now, what may need attention and what adults can do next. Concrete observations make it easier for parents to connect the written summary with familiar moments, such as a child joining play or expressing a need. The summary is brief, but it should still give a useful account of the child’s development across the prime areas.
Sharing it with parents and health visitors
Parents receive the written summary and should have an opportunity to discuss what it says with the practitioner. A parent consultation for progress checks can add valuable context: a child may use different words at home, show particular interests with family members or approach everyday routines in a different way at the setting. Sharing those observations helps parents and practitioners build a fuller picture together, rather than treating the written account as a complete description of the child.
When the practitioner identifies a concern, the setting may suggest an integrated review with the health visitor. This links the early years provider’s observations of learning and participation with the health visitor’s knowledge of the child’s health and development. The two perspectives can help parents and professionals consider whether further advice or support would be useful. The provider’s check remains an early years assessment; the health review complements it rather than replacing the provider’s responsibility to complete the check.
The next step depends on what the concern is and what the family and professionals agree is appropriate. The setting can explain the observations behind its concern, listen to the parents’ perspective and discuss possible support or referral. Where a health visitor is involved, practitioners can work with the family and health visitor to share relevant information and coordinate follow-up. Parents should know who will take each agreed action and how the setting will continue to observe the child’s progress. If a referral is suggested, the practitioner can explain its purpose and discuss the process with the family, without presenting a concern as a diagnosis.
Keeping communication clear helps parents understand how observations from the setting relate to the health review and any agreed support. It also gives practitioners a consistent basis for following the child’s development in familiar activities and revisiting agreed actions with the family.
The EYFS Profile at the end of Reception
The EYFS Profile records a teacher’s assessment of a child’s learning and development at the end of the Reception year. It draws on knowledge built through the child’s everyday experiences in the classroom, rather than a single test or activity. The profile uses shared early learning goals so that judgements are made against the same national framework. Understanding the goals and assessment terms helps families interpret what the results describe.
The 17 early learning goals
The EYFS Profile is completed in the final term of the Reception year and assesses children against 17 early learning goals (ELGs) across seven areas. The areas cover communication, relationships, movement, early reading and writing, number, knowledge of the world, and creative expression. The table gives the number of goals in each area under the statutory EYFS framework.
Emerging or expected
For each of the 17 early learning goals, the teacher records either “emerging” or “expected”. “Expected” means that the child is working at the level described by that goal by the end of Reception. “Emerging” means the child is not yet demonstrating the learning described in the goal consistently enough to meet that level. These are goal-by-goal judgements: a child may be expected in some areas and emerging in others, and neither label is a single overall rating of the child. Teachers make judgements using professional knowledge of the child’s learning across Reception, not performance on one day. Evidence can include what a child says, does and creates during ordinary routines, adult-led activities and child-initiated play. For example, a teacher may observe how a child explains an idea during a conversation, applies a counting strategy while playing, or uses tools to shape materials. Such observational assessment techniques help show whether learning is secure across different situations, rather than rehearsed for a particular task. The teacher considers this evidence against the wording and examples in each statutory ELG descriptor. They draw on ongoing interactions, observations and examples of work, taking account of how independently and consistently the child demonstrates the relevant knowledge or skill. No single piece of work has to determine the judgement; patterns of evidence gathered over time provide a fuller basis for assessing children’s development. The assessment is a teacher’s informed evaluation against the framework, not a timed test or a comparison with classmates.
Good level of development
A good level of development (GLD) means a child is judged “expected” in all 12 early learning goals across communication and language, personal, social and emotional development, physical development, literacy and mathematics. The 12 comprise two goals in communication and language, three in personal, social and emotional development, two in physical development, three in literacy and two in mathematics. A child who is emerging in even one of these 12 goals does not meet the GLD definition, although they may be expected in the other goals. GLD is a specific measure of achievement across these five areas; it does not require an expected judgement in every one of the 17 goals. The other five goals are in understanding the world and expressive arts and design. A separate all-goals figure counts children judged expected in all 17, so it describes a more inclusive set of goals than the GLD measure. Keeping the two definitions distinct makes the reported percentages easier to interpret. In 2024–25, 68.3% of children reached a good level of development, while 66.9% were at the expected level in all 17 goals, according to the Department for Education’s 2024–25 EYFS Profile statistics (DfE, 2024–25). The difference reflects the distinct criteria: GLD is based on the specified 12 goals, whereas the all-17 figure requires expected judgements across every area. These national results describe the proportions meeting each definition in that academic year; they are not an individual child’s score or a prediction of later attainment.
How the results are used
The EYFS Profile results support the move from Reception into Year 1 and help teachers build on what children have learned. They provide a record of development at the end of Reception, rather than a prediction of later attainment. Families can use the information to understand their child’s progress and discuss what may help next. The Reception baseline assessment is a separate assessment carried out earlier in the school year.
Transition to Year 1
The EYFS Profile gives the Year 1 teacher useful information when planning the first part of the new school year. It can be considered alongside classroom observations, children’s work and information shared by families, so teaching starts from a rounded understanding of each child.
At transition, the results can help teachers decide where to begin, what to revisit and which children may benefit from additional support. In practice, this can inform choices such as:
- Planning suitable starting points by connecting children’s demonstrated knowledge and skills with the learning experiences introduced in Year 1.
- Adjusting tasks and explanations, for example by offering extra modelling, visual prompts or more challenging activities to match individual needs.
- Organising focused support when a child’s results and current classroom observations suggest that a particular skill needs further attention.
- Identifying strengths that can be used to engage a child, such as a strong interest or a skill they show confidently in familiar activities.
- Preparing transition conversations with families, using specific examples to explain what their child can do and what learning will continue next.
The Profile should inform professional judgement, not determine every teaching decision. A result records a child’s learning at a particular point; the Year 1 teacher continues to observe progress and adapts teaching as the child encounters new routines, relationships and curriculum content.
Parents can use the reported information to share relevant context, such as activities their child enjoys or changes they have noticed. These conversations help teachers connect the Profile with the child’s experience beyond school and make transition planning more individual.
National data
EYFS Profile results are reported to parents and shared with the Year 1 teacher. Results are also collected nationally by the Department for Education (DfE), allowing national information about outcomes at the end of Reception to be brought together.
These purposes operate at different levels. The individual Profile helps the family and receiving teacher understand one child’s learning, while national collection provides information across schools and local areas. National figures describe patterns in the data; they do not replace a conversation about a particular child’s strengths, progress or next steps.
Schools and local authorities may have record-keeping and transfer arrangements for assessment information. Practices can vary, so parents who need to know how a child’s record is stored or passed to a new setting can ask the school directly. There is no single local filing method that should be assumed for every school.
For teachers, the national collection is distinct from the decisions made in the classroom. A child’s results can contribute to national reporting while still being interpreted in light of day-to-day observations and the child’s circumstances. The DfE collection does not change the purpose of the family report or the receiving teacher’s use of the information during transition.
When discussing results, it is useful to keep the level of information clear: parents receive information about their own child, the Year 1 teacher receives information to support continuity, and the DfE collects results nationally. This distinction helps families understand how an individual assessment can contribute to wider education data without treating national summaries as an individual judgement.
Reception baseline assessment
The Reception baseline assessment is a separate, short assessment taken during a child’s first six weeks in Reception. It is not part of the EYFS Profile, which is completed at the end of the Reception year.
The baseline gives the school information about children’s starting points soon after they begin Reception. It uses brief, age-appropriate activities to assess early skills, including aspects of language, communication, literacy and mathematics. The teacher uses the assessment alongside what they learn through everyday interaction and observation; it is not a complete account of a child’s abilities.
Because the two assessments take place at different points and serve different purposes, their results should not be treated as interchangeable. The baseline is an early measure near the start of school, while the Profile records learning at the end of Reception against the EYFS assessment framework. A baseline result is not an EYFS Profile judgement and does not replace the Profile.
For parents, the key distinction is timing: the baseline happens within the first six weeks of Reception, whereas Profile results relate to the end of that year. If a school discusses both, asking which assessment a result comes from can make the information easier to understand.